US President Donald Trump has reportedly defended the newly announced US-Iran peace agreement in a conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, arguing that the deal effectively removes what he described as Israel’s most significant security concern — the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran. According to reports, Trump urged Netanyahu to view the agreement from a broader strategic perspective, emphasizing that the arrangement substantially reduces the risk of Iran developing nuclear weapons capabilities that could threaten Israel's security.

The remarks come as the United States and Iran move forward with a diplomatic framework designed to ease tensions after months of heightened confrontation in the Middle East. The agreement is expected to serve as a foundation for further negotiations aimed at addressing nuclear concerns, regional stability, and economic sanctions.

Trump has presented the deal as a major diplomatic achievement, arguing that preventing a potential nuclear crisis in the region should take precedence over political disagreements surrounding the terms of the agreement. The US President reportedly stressed that Israel stands to benefit significantly if the deal succeeds in curbing Iran's nuclear ambitions through diplomatic channels rather than military action.

The agreement has generated mixed reactions in Israel. Critics have questioned whether the deal goes far enough to restrict Iran’s nuclear activities, while others have expressed concern that easing sanctions could strengthen Tehran’s influence across the region. Netanyahu has maintained a cautious stance, reiterating Israel’s commitment to defending its national security interests. While avoiding direct criticism of Washington, Israeli officials have indicated that they continue to closely monitor developments related to the agreement and its implementation.

The deal marks a potentially significant shift in regional diplomacy at a time when tensions remain high across the Middle East. Analysts say its success will depend largely on whether both sides adhere to their commitments and whether future negotiations can address long-standing concerns over Iran’s nuclear program.

The development also highlights emerging differences in approach between Washington and Jerusalem. While Trump has increasingly promoted diplomatic engagement as a means of reducing regional instability, Israeli leaders have traditionally favored a tougher stance toward Tehran, citing ongoing security concerns. The agreement represents a major diplomatic test for all parties involved. Supporters view it as an opportunity to reduce the risk of conflict, while skeptics remain uncertain about whether it can deliver lasting security guarantees. As negotiations continue, the international community will be watching closely to see whether the agreement leads to a more stable Middle East or becomes another chapter in the region’s long-running geopolitical tensions.