Iran has strongly criticized recent United States military operations, rejecting Washington’s claim that the actions were taken in self-defence. In a firm response, Iranian officials described the campaign as an “act of aggression,” arguing that it violates international law and further destabilizes an already tense regional situation.

According to statements issued by Iran’s foreign ministry, the country does not accept the US justification for its military strikes. Officials in Tehran emphasized that self-defence cannot be used as a blanket explanation for offensive military operations, especially when there is no immediate or direct threat. They argued that any unilateral attack on Iranian territory or interests without clear provocation should be considered a violation of sovereignty.

Iranian authorities further warned that such actions could have serious consequences for regional peace and security. While stopping short of announcing any immediate retaliation, officials reiterated that Iran reserves the right to respond if it is directly targeted. The government also stressed that continued military pressure could push the region closer to broader instability.

The latest exchange adds to growing tensions between Tehran and Washington, which have seen repeated periods of conflict, sanctions, and diplomatic breakdowns over the years. The situation has already raised concerns among neighbouring countries and global powers, many of whom are closely monitoring developments to prevent further escalation. Security analysts note that rhetoric from both sides has become increasingly sharp, increasing the risk of miscalculation. Even limited military incidents, they warn, could potentially spiral into a wider confrontation if diplomatic communication weakens.

International reactions have largely called for restraint. Several governments and global organizations have urged both the United States and Iran to avoid further escalation and return to dialogue. There are growing concerns that continued hostilities could impact not only regional stability but also global energy markets and trade routes. Tensions remain high, with no clear indication of de-escalation. However, diplomatic backchannels are believed to remain active, leaving room—however limited—for potential negotiation in the coming days.