World
Pakistan's Covert Drone Warfare: A Growing Campaign Against Militants Amid Rising Civilian Casualties

In a recent military clash between Pakistan and India, the skies were filled with advanced drones, signaling a shift from traditional border conflicts to high-tech warfare. However, within Pakistan’s own borders, a covert and increasingly deadly drone campaign has been taking place for years. As internal security in Pakistan deteriorates, fueled by growing Islamist militancy and a violent separatist insurgency, the government has increasingly relied on drones to monitor and target militants, especially in the remote border areas near Afghanistan. While the Pakistani government has not officially acknowledged the role of drones in its counterinsurgency operations, largely due to political sensitivities, the use of these unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has grown.
For years, the U.S. conducted drone strikes in Pakistan targeting Al-Qaeda, the Pakistani Taliban, and other militant groups, often resulting in civilian casualties. Although Pakistan criticized these strikes, it has now adopted a similar strategy. However, reports of civilian deaths from current drone strikes, especially in regions like North Waziristan, have led to public outcry, further exacerbating political tensions.
Pakistani security officials have released videos to counter militant propaganda, showcasing drone strikes on militants and intelligence-gathering operations. In one video, a drone strike targets Pakistani Taliban fighters crossing the border from Afghanistan, and another shows small drones providing real-time intelligence during a ground raid. However, the authenticity of these videos remains uncertain, as independent verification is difficult due to the lack of access to conflict zones.
Pakistan faces one of the most severe militant threats globally, with groups like the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (T.T.P.) and the Baloch Liberation Army (B.L.A.) ranked among the deadliest terrorist organizations. These groups have acknowledged the impact of Pakistan’s drone operations, with the T.T.P. claiming casualties from a strike in late April and accusing a civilian of guiding a drone using a mobile phone.
Pakistan's drone operations mirror those of countries like Iraq, Nigeria, and Turkey, though these actions often raise ethical and legal concerns when targeting citizens. The impact of these drone strikes on civilians is significant, with reports of injuries from a suspected drone strike on spectators at a volleyball match in South Waziristan. Other incidents, like a strike that killed four children in North Waziristan, have fueled protests, calling into question the effectiveness of the government’s security strategy.
Despite claims of precision in drone operations, the civilian toll continues to rise. In March, a strike in Mardan killed 10 people, with conflicting reports about whether they were militants or innocent civilians. The Pakistani Human Rights Commission has called for an investigation into the growing number of civilian casualties. The government's increasing reliance on drones has not only eroded public trust but also sparked protests within the political sphere. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where the government is facing strong opposition from Imran Khan’s party, local lawmakers have raised concerns about the continued use of drones. Some have even argued that these attacks, which fail to distinguish between militants and civilians, should cease.
Pakistan’s former tribal regions along the Afghan border were long the site of U.S. drone operations, which targeted Taliban leaders and militants. These strikes have spanned over two decades, from the first recorded strike in 2004 to the final U.S. strike in 2016 under President Obama. President Trump also authorized several strikes, though no U.S. drone operations have been recorded in Pakistan since mid-2018. Despite over 20 years of drone strikes, many residents of Pakistan’s border areas remain skeptical of their effectiveness. They claim that while drones have come and gone, the core issues driving militancy have not been addressed, leaving fear and insecurity to persist.



